“Decisive Action” isn’t “Fascism,” and Liberals are Tools

It seems to me that liberals, infamous for having no idea what the word “fascism” means, must think it means “decisive”

Supporting Israel, decidedly the most “not-fascist” act possible, becomes “fascist” when it’s done with decisive military and diplomatic activity. Shrinking government, a decidedly “non-fascist” act, becomes “fascist” when it’s done with decisive efficiency. Enforcing criminal justice laws, a neither “fascist” nor “non-fascist” act, becomes “fascist” when it’s done at all, period. The list goes on

Meanwhile liberals are willing participants, “useful idiots,” tools in their own destruction, who support ACTUAL “fascist” acts that they don’t even recognize because of the echo chamber/circle jerk they live in

Colluding with media and Big Tech to censor speech, interfere with elections, and control information, isn’t fascist because it’s a right wing conspiracy that never happened. Anti-semitic campus activity, decidedly the most “fascist” act possible, isn’t fascist because the media controls the message. Waging lawfare against your political opponents, probably the second-most fascist act possible, isn’t fascist because the media controls the message. Again, the list goes on

And while the media provides cover for leftist administrations, they’re able to do all of this slowly, quietly, in the shadows, while avoiding any appearance of “decisiveness” that might alarm anyone