Daiki vs Seijuro

I've seen two posts about this and I want to provide a thought about the evidence that might not have been put forward or acknowledged yet, though I'm very new to this sub so maybe it has.

Simply speaking, each character although might seem like they're speaking to the reader from an omniscient point of view, also is likely speaking from a place of ignorance.

Even though individual characters might have never said something false while commenting on a game, they are still human and I believe that leads us to a beautiful mystery.

To further illustrate my point, imagine if Touo was in a different league entirely. The different league wouldn't interact with the main characters league for whatever reason. In that league, we'd still have Imayoshi saying something like 'Aomine is unbeatable' or 'Aomine is the strongest'. In this different league Aomine and by extension Touo would've never lost, leading Imayoshi's ignorance to never to proven false.

Might've been a messy example but I'm basically saying that characters might not be correct just because they haven't proven false yet. Someone saying Akashi's eye can only be beaten by a similar or better eye could just be there belief/exaggeration after being utterly awestruck, defeated etc.

All in all I think that Aomine could beat Akashi, and Akashi could beat Aomine. I'd also like to believe it personally because it creates a big 'rock-paper-scissor' type web, where one GOM isn't the objective strongest, but each have their own unique talents that can be the strongest depending on the situation.

I also believe that that is the benefit to us never seeing this battle of Aomine vs Akashi, it leaves it up to the reader since it was never directly addressed.

I don't think I'll change my mind, but please comment with your thoughts, opinions and corrections and if I am wrong I'll gladly correct myself.

Thank you for reading😁