Reformed view of the sacraments?

I was raised evangelical and am getting into reformation theology, and one of the things I’m confused about is the reformed view of baptism and communion. The first exposure I had to it was redeemed zoomer, who puts a lot of emphasis on distinguishing reformed sacraments from low-church ordinances, saying that “baptism saves for the elect” and “the Lord’s supper is the flesh and blood of Christ, but spiritually present”. However, when I’ve talked to my Presbyterian friends, they seem to put a lot more emphasis on distinguishing themselves from Catholics, saying things like “baptism is a sign of the new covenant that doesn’t save, you can go to heaven without being baptized” or “the Lord’s supper is not flesh and blood, it’s a sign and symbol”

Is there overlap here? Or is RZ just simping for Catholicism?